Epic fail…
2: Same dress
3. Default oval drop shadow.
6. Correct reflection.. you think they’re gonna put so much effort into photoshopping a 3D image that raytraces it perfectly? Reflection is of the display’s above the ovens.
10. I’ve seen people stand twisting further.
21. So they went through the effort of creating a shadow layer and separate overlay without a reason… I notice not much labelling… somethign tells me diet ad or something?
List looked fun… disappointing not much effort was put into it.
@不注意不发觉 : the disaster is that the girl is missing part of her leg.
I thought the mistake was her third arm.
And for Demi Moore, I guess we’re supposed to think they put someone’s else body and paste Demi Moore’s head on it (or the other way around), but I’m not sure. Besides the dress, there’s many common points between the two pictures : same head position, same top of arms… It could be, but I’m not sure.
To P4INKiller WTF RagingR2,
The only one I wouldn’t call a disaster is the victoria secret’s one. The panty is weird but not a disaster. All the rest of it is awfull work.
The real disaster is photoshop itself. People use it way too much more than necessary. Especially in women’s magazines.
And maybe the other disaster is the fact that people get so much used to it that they find the photoshopped pictures more “real” than reality.
for 10 solid yrs. of using photoshop… i became an expert..
its fantastic.. i love it..
to those who are still studying on it… well good luck.. explore it and you yourself will see how perfect photoshop is
You graphic experts out there should really cut back on the Photoshop abuse. A lot of these photos didn’t even need to be mutilated. Also, Photoshop can’t help Eminem’s stupid looking face.
They should have explained what was wrong with Eminem’s face. Other than the messed up shadow under his nose perhaps, It’s had to tell what’s wrong with the retouch.
Most of them are done in that weird way intentionally.
It’s subliminal advertising strategy:impossible body figures and optical illusions that are perceived not at first quick sight but only in the subconscious and remain frozen there reaching the main purpose not to capture the viewer direct attention but to deeply influence wishes, needs and purposes of people..
You need to put a circle around Demi Moore’s right hand. It looks like they copied and pasted a different size hand, with a grotesque thumb, onto the pic on the W cover. The knees in the right hand photo are equally grotesque.
The Demi Moore one is not a fake. She’s standing with her weight on her right leg (which is also why her right arm is hanging lower). Hence, her left leg is not angled straight down; it’s stepping out a little and adding depth to the shot that you don’t notice right away. As such, the different parts of her leg don’t match up because when you start at the back of a picture and come forward (as Demi’s leg does), you gain width due to depth perception. The other model wearing the same dress has her legs in a reverse position. (You can tell by the model’s knees that her right leg is out in front.) So, it’s pointless to compare them. By the way, some of you ‘theorists’ will note that the model’s right arm ALSO appears to be hanging lower just like Demi’s. That’s because the model is walking (down a fairly obvious catwalk), and her arms are swinging in mid-stride, while Demi is standing in a still pose. In a motion video, you would see the model’s arms’ height change perceptually and perpetually, as they simultaneously swing back and forth in different directions. If you can’t accept all this, it’s probably because you’re more hungry for scandal than truth, even if it means believing that a big magazine like W would be that stupid and a big star like Demi Moore would be that dishonest. Or maybe it’s just a vision problem. Some people can’t see the 3-D images in a Magic Eye picture. Some people can’t see that the Kennedy/Connally bullet traveled a straight line. Some people just can’t see for shit.
i hate all of them
This is crap. Maybe explain what each of the problems is? Half of these look just fine to me.
Really amazing
i like this
splendid, you guys are good
The Kitchen with the reflection isn’t wrong. It’s just the ovens or w/e they are on the wall.
You people are clearly blind. Look harder.
Epic fail…
2: Same dress
3. Default oval drop shadow.
6. Correct reflection.. you think they’re gonna put so much effort into photoshopping a 3D image that raytraces it perfectly? Reflection is of the display’s above the ovens.
10. I’ve seen people stand twisting further.
21. So they went through the effort of creating a shadow layer and separate overlay without a reason… I notice not much labelling… somethign tells me diet ad or something?
List looked fun… disappointing not much effort was put into it.
i think maybe its his eyes but if its not that them wtf man!!!!
Amazing notices… Keep it up!
Wondering what’s wrong in the first photo
PERFECT
nice colection
Nice …. some are freeking bad
Winry says:
2010/08/01 at 16:37
@不注意不发觉 : the disaster is that the girl is missing part of her leg.
I thought the mistake was her third arm.
And for Demi Moore, I guess we’re supposed to think they put someone’s else body and paste Demi Moore’s head on it (or the other way around), but I’m not sure. Besides the dress, there’s many common points between the two pictures : same head position, same top of arms… It could be, but I’m not sure.
To P4INKiller WTF RagingR2,
The only one I wouldn’t call a disaster is the victoria secret’s one. The panty is weird but not a disaster. All the rest of it is awfull work.
The real disaster is photoshop itself. People use it way too much more than necessary. Especially in women’s magazines.
And maybe the other disaster is the fact that people get so much used to it that they find the photoshopped pictures more “real” than reality.
Pity.
nice one
for 10 solid yrs. of using photoshop… i became an expert..
its fantastic.. i love it..
to those who are still studying on it… well good luck.. explore it and you yourself will see how perfect photoshop is
i think eminem just had plastic surgery..
minded
minutia is very important.
idk y people put beyonce on that she is perfectly fine u people r just hating on her!!!!!!!!!!!!
The blog article very surprised to me! Your writing is good. In this I learned a lot! Thank you!
baseball hats
very sharply pointed out mistakes weldone except eminem
@ Demi Moore – it’s NOT her body but a lighter shade of the models with Demi’s head. Check the bone structure and arms etc….that’s not Demi.
I would like to express my appreciation. However, the first phograph has nothing worng.
You graphic experts out there should really cut back on the Photoshop abuse. A lot of these photos didn’t even need to be mutilated. Also, Photoshop can’t help Eminem’s stupid looking face.
stupid designers…
I can’t explain the pic of beyonce ……
grate picktures
Sunset is CLEARLY on Tatoinne. Duh.
They should have explained what was wrong with Eminem’s face. Other than the messed up shadow under his nose perhaps, It’s had to tell what’s wrong with the retouch.
a bane ni kang butae naakanne!!
fantastic research!
eminem eyes is wrong
They did not slim down Demi Moore’s body. They used the body of the model next to her which has identical bone/muscle structure.
wow………….. these imposible…….
nice ones
Most of them are done in that weird way intentionally.
It’s subliminal advertising strategy:impossible body figures and optical illusions that are perceived not at first quick sight but only in the subconscious and remain frozen there reaching the main purpose not to capture the viewer direct attention but to deeply influence wishes, needs and purposes of people..
Congratulations for the excellent attention to how to view ads, which often determines fraud and lack of scruples professionals.
@不注意不发觉 the eminem’s face is too fake like a cartoon but his body looks real, cant u see?! and the 2nd one has a wrong cut ! come on,! blind !?! o_O
v good funny pic ????????????????????????????????????
You need to put a circle around Demi Moore’s right hand. It looks like they copied and pasted a different size hand, with a grotesque thumb, onto the pic on the W cover. The knees in the right hand photo are equally grotesque.
Eminem’s brunette in there, but his hair is actually blonde. That’s the photoshop disaster. =]
its good but very sixtual that is good
its good but very sixtual that is “”"not good”"”
good photo
good synchronization of photos.Thanks
The Demi Moore one is not a fake. She’s standing with her weight on her right leg (which is also why her right arm is hanging lower). Hence, her left leg is not angled straight down; it’s stepping out a little and adding depth to the shot that you don’t notice right away. As such, the different parts of her leg don’t match up because when you start at the back of a picture and come forward (as Demi’s leg does), you gain width due to depth perception. The other model wearing the same dress has her legs in a reverse position. (You can tell by the model’s knees that her right leg is out in front.) So, it’s pointless to compare them. By the way, some of you ‘theorists’ will note that the model’s right arm ALSO appears to be hanging lower just like Demi’s. That’s because the model is walking (down a fairly obvious catwalk), and her arms are swinging in mid-stride, while Demi is standing in a still pose. In a motion video, you would see the model’s arms’ height change perceptually and perpetually, as they simultaneously swing back and forth in different directions. If you can’t accept all this, it’s probably because you’re more hungry for scandal than truth, even if it means believing that a big magazine like W would be that stupid and a big star like Demi Moore would be that dishonest. Or maybe it’s just a vision problem. Some people can’t see the 3-D images in a Magic Eye picture. Some people can’t see that the Kennedy/Connally bullet traveled a straight line. Some people just can’t see for shit.
that’s awesomatically funny
Most of d pictures are sexy,i like them
mistakes & mistakes ….
nais good